![]() ![]() My approach is very similar except that I don't use mind maps. I appreciate all of the detail you provide. I think you have an excellent approach to organizing Evernote. how to manage project support and general reference with Evernote and iPad only. ![]() Here is an article I wrote, it explains why and how I use evernote and manage everything on the iPad. *One of those TV programmes where you really had to be there. I'm not suggesting that Wikis are better than Big, Green - just highlighting that there are other techniques out there beside phrenology (!) that can be useful in handling information. If anyone wants to dabble with Wikis - or any of several other useful server-side applications - I can recommend (but no connection, etc.) who take the sweat out of setting up things that don't always play well with Windows in their own private sandbox. (I like to use the Allo allo* principle in databasing: " I shall say this only once." so if information is out of its sell-by date, one change will update every user) If the address ever changes then, all the notes with that content will be updated with one change. Pretty much like a JPG or PDF shows in a note, except there's a one-to-many linkage - one PDF, several notes to display it. My personal favourite is the transclusion of pages - want to show a contact address in more than one page (note)? Then set the address up in one page, and use a special link in your child page(s) to allow the actual content of the linked page to show, rather than just the link. Once you get into it, the ease of adding data and links - and a very good built-in search engine - is a strong attractor but the ability to index and categorise pages (similar to Notebooks and Tags) and the huge number of add-in apps lifts it even further. I've run several myself, including a personal Wiki that eventually was replaced in my affections by Big, Green - and a 'small' collaboration in a tech support contact centre where around 30 colleagues contributed technical fixes to a knowledge base used by 200+agents. It's certainly good for collaborations, big or small - I've heard of a foreign language textbook being written with it, each specialist chapter being farmed out to experts and researchers in a specific field, and swopped on completion to another team for validation. ![]() Without getting into too much detail (for a change) I like Wiki's - specifically Mediawiki, which is the serverside implementation of Wikipedia. (In practice we're talking about a small number of colleagues, not the whole of Wikipedia.)ĭon't mean to hijack this thread - just think it's interesting how we all work in different ways and pick up hints how things might be done better but at the end of the day, whatever works.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |